Medical Vaccine Review is a compilation of medical information from around the world that calls into question the established perspective that vaccines are safe or effective. Untested vaccines have been administered to unsuspecting patients resulting in considerable morbidity and mortality. No credible independent studies have been conducted on the safety of vaccines. It is immoral and against international law to subject people to any medical experiments without their knowledge, yet the CDC and WHO have passed laws that require mandatory vaccination in the midst of a pandemic and have granted immunity to pharmaceutical corporations for any liability.

In early 2009, the WHO modified its definition of a pandemic.  As a result, any contagious event can now be deemed a “pandemic” with governments implementing tyrannical martial law worldwide, enforcing mandatory vaccination of all people against their will.  With the medical establishment endorsing vaccination as the best means to thwart supposedly “natural” viruses such as the seasonal “swine flu”, a “brave new world order” of medical deception is upon us.  The scientific evidence, or lack thereof, endorsing vaccination as an effective means of preventing viral spread is strategic in maximizing profits for industry and railroading governments into adopting healthcare policies that are detrimental to human health.

We may well ask what is the hidden agenda for mandatory vaccination?  Do we really have a pandemic that threatens our very existence at every turn?  Is this a real threat to our existence, or is this something that has been fabricated by big pharma for mega profits at our expense?  Does the WHO and CDC have a vested interest in vaccine manufacturing?  Are these vaccines safe and have they been tested by independent, third party, scientific groups outside of the pharmaceutical industry and for-profit medical-industrial healthcare complex?  Are viruses really a threat to our public health?  Or are they something altogether different?

In 2006, the National Vital Statistics Report listed 849 cases of death in the US attributed to influenza. Deaths attributed to pneumonia were 55,477 (see “CDC” link, Pg 34). To begin to justify the hysteria surrounding the “seasonal flu”, in 2010, the CDC implemented statistical modeling to estimate a more “accurate” mortality statistic for influenza, based on the mortality rates of all respiratory and circulatory diseases. The rational behind the modeling was what seemed to be under reporting of influenza-related deaths. Influenza-related deaths were estimated from 1976 to 2007, ranging from 3,349 in 1986-87 to 48,614 in 2003-04, 95% CI (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5933a1.htm#tab2). The demographics were an annual average of 97 deaths for the 19-year old or younger group, 666 for those 19-65 and 5,546 for those of age 65 or older (MMWR August 27, 2010/ 59(33);1057-1062). The largest percentage by far of “flu-related” deaths are from the immunocompromised 65 and older age group – those that were previously categorized as pneumonia deaths. Many “flu-related” deaths, however, happen when the influenza can no longer be detected from respiratory samples. Without proof, how can it be determined that the statistical modeling is accurate? How do we know for a fact that influenza precipitated respiratory or circulatory complications? We don’t. Furthermore, if indeed influenza is facilitating more complications leading to death, how do we know that the vaccinated population itself is not “shedding” (see “NVIC” Link) the influenza virus that is contributing to ‘flu-related” deaths?

In 2013, the CDC released a report on influenza-related deaths and stated “the CDC does not know exactly how many people die from flu each year”, yet they feel “it is important to convey the full burden of seasonal flu to the public… seasonal flu is a serious disease… CDC estimates of annual influenza-associated deaths in the United States are made using well-established scientific methods that have been reviewed by scientists outside of CDC.” Are these scientists out-side of the CDC scientists paid by pharmaceutical profits? What incentive do they have to corroborate the 2006 NVSR estimate of 849 annual influenza deaths when they can use “statistical modeling” to foment hysteria that will lead to obscene profits for their vested interests?

On the CDC website (http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/us_flu-related_deaths.htm), they even ask themselves “why doesn’t CDC base its seasonal flu mortality estimates only on death certificates that specifically list influenza?” Their response is that this would be a “gross underestimation of seasonal influenza’s true impact.” Yet, they themselves state “only a small proportion of deaths in either of these two categories (Pneumonia & Influenza) are estimated to be influenza-related. CDC estimated that only 8.5% of all pneumonia and influenza deaths and only 2.1% of all respiratory and circulatory deaths were influenza-related.” So, if only 8.5%, or 4,715, of all pneumonia deaths annually can be attributed to being influenza related, why are we bombarded with such persistent and misleading rhetoric that the “seasonal flu” is the “scourge” of all humanity when some 100,000 people die each year in the US from HAIs (health-care acquired infections) that they got just by stepping into a hospital (http://www.cdc.gov/HAI/pdfs/hai/infections_deaths.pdf)? Instead of vaccinating people with untested, poisonous compounds that in and of themselves contribute to significant morbidity and mortality, wouldn’t it be in the publics’ best interest to avoid hospitals altogether?

Until there can be some proper evidence presented, not just conjecture, as to the real contributing factor that “seasonal influenza virus” plays in respiratory deaths in the US, the flu vaccine cannot be sanctioned. The use of statistical modeling to over inflate influenza “deaths” to 36,000 per annum can only be attributed to the vested interests of the “healthcare” syndicate. It is interestingly coincidental that this falls into place shortly after the pandemic definition was changed. Both of these arbitrary rulings conveniently support the justification for mandatory vaccination, and the indiscriminate, excessive and unwarranted vaccination of our youth – without any scientific justification or purview.

Without proper, peer-reviewed, double blind studies by independent scientific researchers evaluating vaccine safety and efficacy, the entire justification for mandatory vaccination, and vaccination in general, is without merit and calls into question the credibility of our for-profit medical establishment, biologics industries and regulatory healthcare entities.  Current scientific evidence refutes the claims made by companies and organizations perpetrating the fraud of lucrative vaccination campaigns. Medical Vaccine Review calls for a rigorous scientific evaluation of vaccines to establish proper safety guidelines and insists on freedom of choice and the right to self-shield in the wake of supposed pandemics of any kind.